[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] kprobes for s390 architecture
    On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 06:38:40PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
    > You misunderstood me here. I'm not talking about storing the same piece
    > of data to memory on each processor. I'm talking about isolating all
    > other cpus so that the initiating cpu can store the breakpoint to memory
    > without running into the danger that another cpu is trying to execute it
    > at the same time. But probably the store should be atomic in regard to
    > instruction fetching on the other cpus. It is only two bytes and it
    > should be aligned.

    So maybe something like this:

    void smp_replace_instruction(void *info) {
    struct ins_replace_args *parms;
    parms = (struct ins_replace_args *) info;
    *parms->addr = *parms->insn

    void __kprobes arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
    struct ins_replace_args parms;
    parms.addr = p->addr;

    smp_call_function(smp_replace_instruction, &parms, 0, 1);

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-21 19:37    [W:0.070 / U:2.748 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site