![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, [whoa, maybe I shouldn't have used such an inflammatory subject, the mail volume would suggest that ;-)] On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:43:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:16:55AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Am I completely missing something here? > > > > Yes. You are missing that modern hw already protects itself. See my blog on planet.kernel.org. > > And you are missing that not everyone is running linux on the latest CPUs. Darn right. Intel has been having thermal protection for a somewhat longer time, but Athlon had serious issues with missing or incompletely functioning thermal sensors on many not too outdated (let's say it was 4 years ago, ok?) motherboard/CPU combos. And I don't really want to know about thermal protection status of various Cyrix, VIA or even Winchip CPUs (you've been a nic^H^Hïve believer of competition in a healthy marketplace and bought some of those, right? I know I did... ;). But since Pavel's blog mentions that thermal protection is an ACPI specification, there's hope that it may actually work half-decently after all. Andreas Mohr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-20 09:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||