lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>> This looks awesome. Are there any plans to get these
>> sub-architectures to work with the generic subarch? Seems the next
>> logical step would be putting each mach-*/*.o into separated namespaces.
>
> I haven't looked at that. This patch was intended to be a very simple
> uncontroversial rearrangement, in preparation for the Xen subarch, and
> to just clean up a corner of the kernel which seems to have gotten a
> bit warty. Chris just sent me your patches from March which look like
> they cover a lot of the same ground, but I haven't looked at them in
> detail yet.

This is cleaner than the patches I sent in March, although we want to
re-use parts of the mach-default code, not replace it entirely. Hence
my interest in the multi-subarch generic kernel. I'd be glad to look
into it.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-21 02:43    [W:0.101 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site