lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup
    Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
    > Zachary Amsden wrote:
    >> This looks awesome. Are there any plans to get these
    >> sub-architectures to work with the generic subarch? Seems the next
    >> logical step would be putting each mach-*/*.o into separated namespaces.
    >
    > I haven't looked at that. This patch was intended to be a very simple
    > uncontroversial rearrangement, in preparation for the Xen subarch, and
    > to just clean up a corner of the kernel which seems to have gotten a
    > bit warty. Chris just sent me your patches from March which look like
    > they cover a lot of the same ground, but I haven't looked at them in
    > detail yet.

    This is cleaner than the patches I sent in March, although we want to
    re-use parts of the mach-default code, not replace it entirely. Hence
    my interest in the multi-subarch generic kernel. I'd be glad to look
    into it.

    Zach
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-21 02:43    [W:0.020 / U:32.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site