Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:40:43 -0700 | From | Zachary Amsden <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6.17] Clean up and refactor i386 sub-architecture setup |
| |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Zachary Amsden wrote: >> This looks awesome. Are there any plans to get these >> sub-architectures to work with the generic subarch? Seems the next >> logical step would be putting each mach-*/*.o into separated namespaces. > > I haven't looked at that. This patch was intended to be a very simple > uncontroversial rearrangement, in preparation for the Xen subarch, and > to just clean up a corner of the kernel which seems to have gotten a > bit warty. Chris just sent me your patches from March which look like > they cover a lot of the same ground, but I haven't looked at them in > detail yet.
This is cleaner than the patches I sent in March, although we want to re-use parts of the mach-default code, not replace it entirely. Hence my interest in the multi-subarch generic kernel. I'd be glad to look into it.
Zach - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |