Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:34:30 -0700 (PDT) | | From | Christoph Lameter <> | | Subject | Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless |
| |
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Anyway, I can drop a spinlock in (in fact I have) the ppc64 irq code for > now but that sucks, thus we should really seriously consider having the > lockless tree in 2.6.18 or I might have to look into doing an alternate > implementation specifically in arch code... or find some other way of > doing the inverse mapping there...
How many interrupts do you have to ? I would expect a simple table lookup would be fine to get from the virtual to the real interrupt.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |