Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:02:43 -0400 | From | "Dave Neuer" <> | Subject | Re: [git pull] ieee1394 tree for 2.6.18 |
| |
On 6/20/06, Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:29:37PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > > Russell King wrote: > > >On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:14:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >>I want them to tell me what they are sending, so that _when_ I pull, I > > >>can line up the result of that pull with the mail they sent, and I can > > >>tell "ok, that's actually what the other side intended". > > > > > >Given that you've complained about me sending daily pull requests > > >already, how do you intend folk to handle the situation where they've > > >sent you a pull request, it's apparantly been ignored, and they update > > >the tree from which you pull (maybe for akpm's benefit) and then you > > >eventually get around to pulling it a couple of days later? > > [...] > > > > I don't maintain git repos myself, but I'd say _branches_ or something > > like that might be the way to go. > > The point was to try to establish when we could consider the tree from > which we'd asked Linus to pull from as being sufficiently old that it > would not be pulled from without another request being sent - or if it > was pulled from, that we wouldn't get an email from Linus about the fact > there was new stuff in there.
Can git pull a tag?
Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |