[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] smt nice introduces significant lock contention
    On Friday 02 June 2006 17:53, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > This is a small micro-optimisation / cleanup we can do after
    > smtnice gets converted to use trylocks. Might result in a little
    > less cacheline footprint in some cases.

    It's only dependent_sleeper that is being converted in these patches. The
    wake_sleeping_dependent component still locks all runqueues and needs to
    succeed in order to ensure a task doesn't keep sleeping indefinitely. That
    one doesn't get called from schedule() so is far less expensive. This means I
    don't think we can change that cpu based locking order which I believe was
    introduce to prevent a deadlock (?DaveJ disovered it iirc).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-02 10:20    [W:0.026 / U:47.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site