[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] smt nice introduces significant lock contention
    On Friday 02 June 2006 19:53, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
    > Yeah, but that is the worst case though. Average would probably be a lot
    > lower than worst case. Also, on smt it's not like the current logical cpu
    > is getting blocked because of another task is running on its sibling CPU.
    > The hardware still guarantees equal share of hardware resources for both
    > logical CPUs.

    "Equal share of hardware resources" is exactly the problem; they shouldn't
    have equal share since they're sharing one physical cpu's resources. It's a
    relative breakage of the imposed nice support and I disagree with your

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-02 12:15    [W:0.041 / U:25.392 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site