Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:21:34 -0600 | | From | "Chris Friesen" <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] CPU controllers? |
| |
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Scheduling contexts do sound useful. They're easily defeated though, as > evolution mail demonstrates to me every time it's GUI hangs and I see > that a nice 19 find is running, eating very little CPU, but effectively > DoSing evolution nonetheless (journal). I wonder how often people who > tried to distribute CPU would likewise be stymied by other resources.
We do a lot with diskless blades. Basically cpu(s), memory, and network ports.
For this case, cpu, memory, and network controllers are sufficient. Even just cpu gets you a long way, since mostly we're not IO-intensive and we generally have a pretty good idea of memory consumption.
Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |