![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:48:59 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > So, I think "stop mis-configurated process" can be one way for handling such apps. > > > > For example) > > After exchanging broken cpu, the application can continue its work with the > > same # of cpus. > > OK I can see what you're trying to achieve, but I don't know that it is > worthwhile. Userspace is doing something wrong, and it isn't normally the > kernel's job to detect that. > > When something like this comes up, sticking to the simplest semantics is > often best. > > That said, it isn't a great deal of code to maintain, and not "incorrect" > as such. So if you convince Ingo to pick it up, I wouldn't complain. > Thank you for discussing. I'll rewrite text in the patch to reflect my point clearer. and post again Regards, -Kame - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-17 11:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||