[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: NFSv3 client reordering RENAMEs
Janne Karhunen wrote:

>On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:44, Peter Staubach wrote:
>>>really expect RENAME to be reordered as mv is generally considered
>>>atomic. That, and RFC 1813 mandates RENAME to be atomic. Is this a
>>>known thing and do you guys consider this feature or a bug?
>>Can you construct a testcase which exhibits this behavior?
>Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be
>considered as bug and not as a feature :/

Yes, I believe that this would be considered to be a bug...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-15 18:08    [W:0.048 / U:1.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site