lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: NFSv3 client reordering RENAMEs
Janne Karhunen wrote:

>On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:44, Peter Staubach wrote:
>
>
>
>>>really expect RENAME to be reordered as mv is generally considered
>>>atomic. That, and RFC 1813 mandates RENAME to be atomic. Is this a
>>>known thing and do you guys consider this feature or a bug?
>>>
>>>
>>Can you construct a testcase which exhibits this behavior?
>>
>>
>
>Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be
>considered as bug and not as a feature :/
>

Yes, I believe that this would be considered to be a bug...

ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-15 18:08    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site