[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: NFSv3 client reordering RENAMEs
    Janne Karhunen wrote:

    >On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:44, Peter Staubach wrote:
    >>>really expect RENAME to be reordered as mv is generally considered
    >>>atomic. That, and RFC 1813 mandates RENAME to be atomic. Is this a
    >>>known thing and do you guys consider this feature or a bug?
    >>Can you construct a testcase which exhibits this behavior?
    >Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be
    >considered as bug and not as a feature :/

    Yes, I believe that this would be considered to be a bug...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-15 18:08    [W:0.019 / U:90.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site