![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> Chase Venters wrote: > > can you name some non-GPL non-proprietary modules we should be concerned > > about? > You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary". If so, then by > definition there are none. > > Regards, > > Daniel Are you saying that there do not exist any non-proprietary licenses that are incompatible with the GPL? That's obviously not true. Consider, for example, a license that was basically the BSD license with an additional prohibition against licensing with new restrictions. Consider the original BSD license with advertising clause. Consider a license that requires the source to always travel with the binary. DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-14 06:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||