lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRE: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
    Date

    > Chase Venters wrote:

    > > can you name some non-GPL non-proprietary modules we should be concerned
    > > about?

    > You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary". If so, then by
    > definition there are none.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Daniel

    Are you saying that there do not exist any non-proprietary licenses that
    are incompatible with the GPL? That's obviously not true. Consider, for
    example, a license that was basically the BSD license with an additional
    prohibition against licensing with new restrictions. Consider the original
    BSD license with advertising clause. Consider a license that requires the
    source to always travel with the binary.

    DS


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-14 08:32    [W:0.023 / U:1.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site