lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Date

> Chase Venters wrote:

> > can you name some non-GPL non-proprietary modules we should be concerned
> > about?

> You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary". If so, then by
> definition there are none.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel

Are you saying that there do not exist any non-proprietary licenses that
are incompatible with the GPL? That's obviously not true. Consider, for
example, a license that was basically the BSD license with an additional
prohibition against licensing with new restrictions. Consider the original
BSD license with advertising clause. Consider a license that requires the
source to always travel with the binary.

DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-14 08:32    [W:0.297 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site