![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes: > But it's not just about the amount of false negatives, but also about > the overhead of scanning. You are concentrated on embedded systems with > small RAM - but most of the testers will be running this with at last > 1GB of RAM - which is _alot_ of memory to scan. Most of this should be normally in page cache which doesn't need to be scanned? There might be some extreme loads with a lot more kernel data, but they are probably rare. -Andi 7 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-14 05:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||