![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi Ingo, On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i dont know - i feel uneasy about the 'any pointer' method - it has a > high potential for false negatives, especially for structures that > contain strings (or other random data), etc. Is that a problem in practice? Structures that contain data are usually allocated from the slab. There needs to be a link to that struct from the gc roots to get a false negative. Or am I missing something here? Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-13 05:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||