Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:41:55 +1000 | | From | Nathan Scott <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode |
| |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:00:59PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Nathan Scott wrote: > > Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you
Oh, I should clarify - the suggestion of using sb->s_blocksize/ s_blocksize_bits was what I meant by "would break XFS".
> > suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different > > blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used, > > and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to > > distinguish this preferred IO size difference. > > It can be made into an inode operation:
*nod* - that'd work fine for our needs here.
cheers.
-- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |