lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode
Nathan Scott wrote:
>
> Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you
> suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different
> blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used,
> and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to
> distinguish this preferred IO size difference.
>

It can be made into an inode operation:

if (inode->i_ops->getblksize)
return inode->i_ops->getblksize(inode);
else
return inode->i_sb->s_blksize;
Trading some efficiency for space.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-13 16:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site