lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode
    Nathan Scott wrote:
    >
    > Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you
    > suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different
    > blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used,
    > and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to
    > distinguish this preferred IO size difference.
    >

    It can be made into an inode operation:

    if (inode->i_ops->getblksize)
    return inode->i_ops->getblksize(inode);
    else
    return inode->i_sb->s_blksize;

    Trading some efficiency for space.

    --
    error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-13 16:03    [W:0.055 / U:0.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site