[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode
    Nathan Scott wrote:
    > Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you
    > suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different
    > blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used,
    > and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to
    > distinguish this preferred IO size difference.

    It can be made into an inode operation:

    if (inode->i_ops->getblksize)
    return inode->i_ops->getblksize(inode);
    return inode->i_sb->s_blksize;

    Trading some efficiency for space.

    error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-13 16:03    [W:0.020 / U:7.784 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site