Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:21:43 -0700 | From | "Nate Diller" <> | Subject | Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results |
| |
On 6/12/06, Vishal Patil <vishpat@gmail.com> wrote: > Jens > > Could you let me know what tests would be fair to make comparsion > between the I/O schedulers? Thanks.
any filesystem benchmark should be informative, namesys tests with a whole suite, bonnie++, iozone, mongo (custom), and one or two others. You can ask on reiserfs-list for more information.
I suggest testing against more than one filesystem as well, it's quite common for a FS to "prefer" one scheduler.
NATE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |