lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [patch] undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-type instead
    From
    From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
    Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:03:56 +1000

    > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > >
    > > regarding your point wrt. path of integration - it is pretty much the
    > > only practical way to do this centrally as part of the lock validator
    > > patches, but to collect ACKs from subsystem maintainers in the process.
    > > So if you like it i'd like to have your ACK but this patch depends on
    > > the other lock validator patches (and only makes sense together with
    > > them), so they should temporarily stay in the lock validator queue.
    > > Hopefully this wont be a state that lasts too long and once the
    > > validator is upstream, all patches of course go via the subsystem
    > > submission rules.
    >
    > Obviously as long as Dave is happy with it then it's fine. However,
    > it's probably a good idea to cc netdev for relevant patches so that
    > they get a wider review. If you've already sent this one there then
    > I apologise for missing it :)

    Yes, this is fine with me.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-12 09:21    [W:0.023 / U:0.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site