lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [patch] undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-type instead
From
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:03:56 +1000

> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > regarding your point wrt. path of integration - it is pretty much the
> > only practical way to do this centrally as part of the lock validator
> > patches, but to collect ACKs from subsystem maintainers in the process.
> > So if you like it i'd like to have your ACK but this patch depends on
> > the other lock validator patches (and only makes sense together with
> > them), so they should temporarily stay in the lock validator queue.
> > Hopefully this wont be a state that lasts too long and once the
> > validator is upstream, all patches of course go via the subsystem
> > submission rules.
>
> Obviously as long as Dave is happy with it then it's fine. However,
> it's probably a good idea to cc netdev for relevant patches so that
> they get a wider review. If you've already sent this one there then
> I apologise for missing it :)

Yes, this is fine with me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-12 09:21    [W:0.102 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site