[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
On 12/06/06, Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
> What i'd like to see though are clear explanations about why an
> allocation is not considered a leak, in terms of comments added to the
> code. That will also help us reduce the number of annotations later on.

I'll document them in both Documentation/kmemleak.txt and inside the
code. If I implement the "any pointer inside the block" method, all
the memleak_padding() false positives will disappear.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-12 14:58    [W:0.118 / U:5.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site