[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
    On 12/06/06, Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
    > What i'd like to see though are clear explanations about why an
    > allocation is not considered a leak, in terms of comments added to the
    > code. That will also help us reduce the number of annotations later on.

    I'll document them in both Documentation/kmemleak.txt and inside the
    code. If I implement the "any pointer inside the block" method, all
    the memleak_padding() false positives will disappear.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-12 14:58    [W:0.041 / U:13.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site