![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> Well for now you pretty much just moved code, that was in the kernel > before. What I'm trying to find out is what is coming next. How does e.g. > udev or modules fit into the picture? udev and module-init-tools fits nicely with the kernel. I never have understood this 'keep-everyhig-separate' mantra. Just see how many people had troubles with missing module-init-tools or people having troubles with non-backward compatible udev. > For -mm that's fine, but do you seriously expect it to get merged like > that. Again, what makes klibc so special, that it doesn't have to follow > standard rules? So part of what you ask for is a set of incremental patches that shows all the kernal modifications? That should be doable with some effort but unfortunately I'm not up to the task. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-10 08:16 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||