lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:47:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> couldnt most of these problems be avoided by tracking whether a handler
> _ever_ returned a success status? That means that irqpoll could safely
> poll handlers for which we know that they somehow arent yet matched up
> to any IRQ line?

But you may get random positive hits from this when a real IRQ for an
unrelated device happens to get delivered. We could poll enabled IRQs first
then disabled ones ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-01 11:49    [W:0.283 / U:0.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site