Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Jun 2006 05:46:43 -0400 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq() |
| |
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:47:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > couldnt most of these problems be avoided by tracking whether a handler > _ever_ returned a success status? That means that irqpoll could safely > poll handlers for which we know that they somehow arent yet matched up > to any IRQ line?
But you may get random positive hits from this when a real IRQ for an unrelated device happens to get delivered. We could poll enabled IRQs first then disabled ones ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |