![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Evgeniy, On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Since pseudo-randomness affects both folded and not folded hash > distribution, it can not end up in different results. Yes it would, so to rule out pseudo-random effects the pseudo- random number generator must be removed. > > You are right that having test with 2^48 values is really interesting, > but it will take ages on my test machine :) Try a usable subset; no pseudo-random number generator. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-06-01 06:48 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||