[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Direct I/O bio size regression
    On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:30 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
    > Got any data that you can share with us?

    The thread was from July 2004 and was called:

    Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [announce]
    [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption

    Also some info in thread:

    Re: [patch]

    > Wrt latency, is the problem to do with large requests causing short
    > term latency? I thought that latency minimisation is the job of the
    > I/O scheduler, so if this is the case, doesn't this indicate a
    > deficiency of the I/O scheduler? e.g. the I/o scheduler could split
    > large requests to reduce latency, just like you merge adjacent
    > requests to reduce the number of I/Os and keep overall latency
    > low...

    I think you are talking past each other - Jens is referring to scheduler
    latency, not IO latency.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-07 18:28    [W:0.019 / U:8.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site