[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Direct I/O bio size regression
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:30 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> Got any data that you can share with us?

The thread was from July 2004 and was called:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [announce]
[patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption

Also some info in thread:

Re: [patch]

> Wrt latency, is the problem to do with large requests causing short
> term latency? I thought that latency minimisation is the job of the
> I/O scheduler, so if this is the case, doesn't this indicate a
> deficiency of the I/O scheduler? e.g. the I/o scheduler could split
> large requests to reduce latency, just like you merge adjacent
> requests to reduce the number of I/Os and keep overall latency
> low...

I think you are talking past each other - Jens is referring to scheduler
latency, not IO latency.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-07 18:28    [W:0.070 / U:2.268 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site