lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 7 May 2006 14:18:25 +0100
FromRussell King <>
SubjectRe: sched_clock() uses are broken
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:00:29PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> >I stand by my first reply to your comment WRT the API.
> 
> Actually, on rereading, it seems like I was a bit confused about
> your proposal. I don't think you specified anyway the units
> returned by your new sched_clock(). So it is identical to my
> "corrected" interface :\

Okay, so that presumably means we have to either stick with what we
currently have, or go the whole hog and re-implement the sched_clock()
support?

IOW, my patch on 2nd May isn't of any use as it currently stands?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-07 13:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2008