![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Friday 05 May 2006 07:56, Paul Mackerras wrote: > I don't like exporting low-level implementation details like this, and > it seems a bit bogus to have an SLB miss handler in a module. Could > you move the SLB miss handler to the non-modular part? Yes. The series already has the patches to move the SLB miss handler into the built-in parts. At the moment, we also need the symbols for the context switch code that also touches the SLB entries. We already have a patch to move that as well, but are still discussing the details of that. I'll follow up with a patch to replace this one. Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-05 11:59 [W:0.803 / U:0.100 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||