![]() | |||||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> x86_64 uses numerous x86 files in this manner, and now we we have x86 using > a couple of x86_64 files in a siilar manner. I think this is a bad thing, > and that we should make all these cross-references operate in the same > direction rather than in both directions. x86_64 developers already have > to deal with this problem, so why make start burdening x86 developers also? So far the only complaints I heard was from a few people who deleted everything but arch/i386. I wasn't very sympathetic to that particular problem because doing so means they don't care about other architectures at all. > > > Anyway. Andi, I'll drop x86_64-mm-new-northbridge-fix.patch. Please add > these exports to your copy of x86_64-mm-new-northbridge.patch It's already in the version on firstfloor. Just resync with that. -Andi P.S.: Since ff connectivity has been spotty in the past I'm also working on mirroring the patches directly to ftp.x86-64.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-04 07:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||||