![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 5/4/06, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote: > On 5/4/06, Phillip Hellewell <phillip@hellewell.homeip.net> wrote: > > + > > +#define ecryptfs_printk(type, fmt, arg...) \ > > + __ecryptfs_printk(type "%s: " fmt, __FUNCTION__, ## arg); > > +void __ecryptfs_printk(const char *fmt, ...); > > Why not plain printk? Originally, ecryptfs_printk was using a verbosity level, which is why there was a custom call wrapping printk. This is no longer the case, and the eCryptfs developers are currently looking at this, and are planning to remove the bulk of printks. Thanks, Mike -- Michael C. Thompson <mcthomps@us.ibm.com> Software-Engineer, IBM LTC Security - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-04 17:10 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||