lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 4 May 2006 10:08:03 -0500
From"Michael Thompson" <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/13: eCryptfs] Header declarations
On 5/4/06, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Phillip Hellewell <phillip@hellewell.homeip.net> wrote:
> > +
> > +#define ecryptfs_printk(type, fmt, arg...) \
> > +        __ecryptfs_printk(type "%s: " fmt, __FUNCTION__, ## arg);
> > +void __ecryptfs_printk(const char *fmt, ...);
>
> Why not plain printk?

Originally, ecryptfs_printk was using a verbosity level, which is why
there was a custom call wrapping printk. This is no longer the case,
and the eCryptfs developers are currently looking at this, and are
planning to remove the bulk of printks.

Thanks,
Mike

--
Michael C. Thompson <mcthomps@us.ibm.com>
Software-Engineer, IBM LTC Security
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-04 17:10    [from the cache]
©2003-2008