lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
Hi,

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> on one side, the -mm kernel is about showcasing new code and finding
> bugs in them as fast as possible. Having new debugging options enabled
> by default is an important part of the testing effort. Users will care
> more about having no crashes than about having 0.5% more performance in
> select benchmarks.
>
> on the other side, you obviously dont want a 0.5% overhead for select
> benchmarks, as that would mess up the history! A very fair and valid
> position too.
>
> but one side has to give, we cant have both.

As I mentioned before, please keep these defaults as a -mm-only patch,
Giving them testing in -mm is fine, but defaults are already way too much
abused as is. The default rule should be to enable an option explicitly,
if it's needed, it should not be auto-enabled, because its author likes
it so much. Using a "default y" should be close to hiding the option via
CONFIG_EMBEDDED or some other option and the default should not differ
between hidden and visible state, e.g.:

config FOO
bool "foo" if BAR
default y

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-01 00:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans