lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add max6902 RTC support
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 15:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> That's a problem. According to the Developer's Certificate of Origin
> process we'd need "Someone at Compulab" to send us a Signed-off-by:, along
> with the assertions which that carries.

Don't clauses (a) and/or (b) include provisions that mean Raphael takes
on this responsibility if he believes that CompuLab released the patch
under a suitable open source license? In particular the "to the best of
my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license" bit
in (b).

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the
best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open
source license and I have the right under that license to submit
that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in
part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in
the file; or

...

Ian.
--
Ian Campbell

zeal, n.:
Quality seen in new graduates -- if you're quick.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-31 08:34    [W:0.058 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site