![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote: > > Darn. It said all tests passed, then oopsed.>> does this fix it?> > type->name can be NULL legitimately; all places but one check for this > already. Fix this off-by-one. that used to be the case, but shouldnt happen anymore - with current lockdep code we always pass some string to the lock init code. (that's what lock-init-improvement.patch achieves in essence.) Worst-case the string should be "old_style_spin_init" or "old_style_rw_init". So Mike please try the other patch i sent - it also adds a debugging check so that we can see where that NULL name comes from. It could be something benign like me forgetting to pass in a string somewhere in the initialization macros, but it could also be something more nasty like an initialize-by-memset assumption. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-30 09:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||