![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread Patch in this message |
* Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> wrote: > > on lockdep we have a quite big spinlock_t, so keep the size down. > > Yes, that builds fine. > > However the kernel won't boot for me... it oopses early on in > save_stack_trace(). I'm attaching a bootlog, plus another try booting > with nmi_watchdog=0, plus my config. there's some bad interaction between the new dwarf2 unwind info stackframe walker code in mm1 and lockdep's stacktrace code on x86_64. I'm investigating this currently, meanwhile you can try the quick hack below. Ingo Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ save_context_stack(struct stack_trace *t skip--; if (trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries) break; - if (!addr) +#warning fixme +// if (!addr) return 0; /* * Stack frames must go forwards (otherwise a loop could - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-30 22:51 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||