![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:20 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > May 30 20:25:56 ltg01-fedora kernel: which lock already depends on the new lock, > > > > ... but there was an observed code sequence before which was the other > > way around ... > > That phrase could use some rewording IMO. It sounds more like a question > than a statement. if you have suggestions please share them... you're the native United Kingdomian.... :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-30 22:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||