Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 06/61] lock validator: add __module_address() method | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Tue, 30 May 2006 13:45:10 -0400 |
| |
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 18:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'd suggest that __module_address() should do the same thing, from an API neatness > POV. Although perhaps that's mot very useful if we didn't take a ref on the returned > object (but module_text_address() doesn't either). > > Also, the name's a bit misleading - it sounds like it returns the address > of a module or something. __module_any_address() would be better, perhaps?
How about __valid_module_address() so that it describes exactly what it is doing. Or __module_address_valid().
-- Steve
> > Also, how come this doesn't need modlist_lock()?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |