Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] s390: Hypervisor File System | From | Michael Holzheu <> | Date | Wed, 3 May 2006 10:48:19 +0200 |
| |
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote on 04/29/2006 10:14:23 AM:
[snip]
> > > Also, "/sys/hypervisor" is probably insufficiently specific. In a few > > > years time people will be asking "Which hypervisor? We have > eighteen of them!". > > > > I agree, the xen people are already clammering for some kind of sysfs > > tree and wanted to create /sys/hypervisor/xen. How about > > /sys/hypervisor/s390?
Fine with me! Then I will create /sys/hypervisor/s390. Should I create /sys/hypervisor in the hpyfs code or should it be created somewhere else?
> Yes, something like that. Even "hypfs" is possibly too generic.
What about s390-hypfs?
Michael
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |