Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 May 2006 10:40:19 -0400 | From | "Jon Smirl" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/14] Reworked patch for labels on user space messages |
| |
On 5/3/06, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:11:52AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > Something seems to be wrong in selinux_get_task_sid. I am getting > > thousands of these and can't boot the kernel. > > It's actually in security/selinux/hooks.c::selinux_disable() and gets > triggered if you have selinux enabled and explicitly disable afterwards. > Stephen Smalley had done a fix yesterday, basically adding > selinux_enabled = 0; > after > selinux_disabled = 1; > in there. selinux_get_task_sid() happens to step on that in visible way > and nobody had caught that while this stuff was sitting in -mm ;-/ > > The only question I have about that patch: what would happen if we do not > have CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM? In that case selinux_enabled is > defined to 1, so...
I have these config options set:
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=1 CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DEVELOP=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_AVC_STATS=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_CHECKREQPROT_VALUE=1
SELinux needs to be built in or FC5 won't run.
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |