lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 29 May 2006 18:35:23 -0700
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: [patch 34/61] lock validator: special locking: bdev
On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:25:54 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> 
> teach special (recursive) locking code to the lock validator. Has no
> effect on non-lockdep kernels.
> 

There's no description here of the problem which is being worked around. 
This leaves everyone in the dark.

> +static int
> +blkdev_get_whole(struct block_device *bdev, mode_t mode, unsigned flags)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * This crockload is due to bad choice of ->open() type.
> +	 * It will go away.
> +	 * For now, block device ->open() routine must _not_
> +	 * examine anything in 'inode' argument except ->i_rdev.
> +	 */
> +	struct file fake_file = {};
> +	struct dentry fake_dentry = {};
> +	fake_file.f_mode = mode;
> +	fake_file.f_flags = flags;
> +	fake_file.f_dentry = &fake_dentry;
> +	fake_dentry.d_inode = bdev->bd_inode;
> +
> +	return do_open(bdev, &fake_file, BD_MUTEX_WHOLE);
> +}

"crock" is a decent description ;)

How long will this live, and what will the fix look like?

(This is all a bit of a pain - carrying these patches in -mm will require
some effort, and they're not ready to go yet, which will lengthen the pain
arbitrarily).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-30 03:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2008