![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:27:51 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > teach special (non-nested) unlocking code to the lock validator. Has no > effect on non-lockdep kernels. > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> > --- > net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 +- > net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Index: linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c > +++ linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c > @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *xfrm_p > afinfo = xfrm_policy_afinfo[family]; > if (likely(afinfo != NULL)) > read_lock(&afinfo->lock); > - read_unlock(&xfrm_policy_afinfo_lock); > + read_unlock_non_nested(&xfrm_policy_afinfo_lock); > return afinfo; > } > > Index: linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c > +++ linux/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c > @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static struct xfrm_state_afinfo *xfrm_st > afinfo = xfrm_state_afinfo[family]; > if (likely(afinfo != NULL)) > read_lock(&afinfo->lock); > - read_unlock(&xfrm_state_afinfo_lock); > + read_unlock_non_nested(&xfrm_state_afinfo_lock); > return afinfo; > } > I got a bunch of rejects here due to changes in git-net.patch. Please verify the result. It could well be wrong (the changes in there are odd). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-30 03:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||