Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1 of 10] ipath - fix spinlock recursion bug | | From | Bryan O'Sullivan <> | | Date | Wed, 24 May 2006 07:45:58 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 14:31 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> It's probably OK as long as it's pure code motion.
I'll recheck and make sure that it is before I send you anything. Thanks.
> What I want to > avoid is the giant combo patch that does several different things, > because if someone later bisects a regression back to that patch, > we're kind of screwed...
Yeah, I've been doing some educating lately about that :-)
<b
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |