![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Peter Williams wrote: > Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 15:38 +1000, Peter Williams wrote: >> >>> In my schedulers I generalize background to "soft cpu rate caps" with >>> a cap of zero being the same as background. I have patches to add >>> both soft and hard cpu rate caps to the standard scheduler but I'm >>> sitting on them until things settle down a bit. >> >> I look forward to seeing them. Any chance of a preview? >> > > I'll post them as a "request for comment" tomorrow. I'm still undecided > about the best user space interface for using them. At the moment, I > have mechanisms to set them via /proc which is very handy for testing > but not necessarily the best interface for general use. Other options > are via rlimits or a syscall. There'll be a delay in this posting as I've discovered uses of MAX_PRIO (in 2.7.17-rc4-mm3) that would be broken by my current patches. I'll fix that problem and hopefully post the patches in the near future. Sorry Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-23 07:26 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||