![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:24:07PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> @@ -925,8 +926,9 @@ > >> if (dev->no_msi) > >> return status; > >> > >> - if (dev->bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI) > >> - return -EINVAL; > >> + for (bus = dev->bus; bus; bus = bus->parent) > >> + if (bus->bus_flags & PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> > >> temp = dev->irq; > >> > > > > It seems we must add this loop to pci_enable_msix as well. > > > > Right, thanks. Greg, what do you think of putting the attached patch in > 2.6.17 ? Ok, does everyone agree that this patch fixes the issues for them? I've had a few other private emails saying that the current code doesn't work properly and hadn't been able to determine what was happening. Thanks for these patches. > By the way, do we need to check dev->no_msi in pci_enable_msix() too ? Yes, good catch, care to respin the patch and give it a good changelog entry? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-23 06:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||