Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 May 2006 09:11:07 +0200 | From | Olaf Hering <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release' |
| |
On Sat, Aug 06, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de> > Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200 > > > So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather > > unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations... > > Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed > up somehow.
I think you are right once again. (Just the time got a bit out of sync.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |