![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 15:38 +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > >> In my schedulers I generalize background to "soft cpu rate caps" with a >> cap of zero being the same as background. I have patches to add both >> soft and hard cpu rate caps to the standard scheduler but I'm sitting on >> them until things settle down a bit. > > I look forward to seeing them. Any chance of a preview? > I'll post them as a "request for comment" tomorrow. I'm still undecided about the best user space interface for using them. At the moment, I have mechanisms to set them via /proc which is very handy for testing but not necessarily the best interface for general use. Other options are via rlimits or a syscall. Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-22 08:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||