lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 22 May 2006 07:59:24 +0200
Fromdragoran <>
SubjectRe: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>  > On Monday 22 May 2006 00:28, Dave Jones wrote:>  > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>  > > >  > >  > >  > You make a good point.  In fact, given it's unthrottled, someone
>  > >  > >  > with too much time on their hands could easily fill up a /var
>  > >  > >  > just by calling unimplemented syscalls this way.>  > >  > >  > >  > I never bought this argument because there are tons of printks in the kernel
>  > >  > that can be triggered by everybody.>  > > >  > > Then they should also be either rate limited, or removed.>  > >  > Yes let's remove all that kernel debugging support. It is totally useless
>  > for most users, isn't it?>> If a regular user can trip up debugging printks, yes, lets remove it.
> Examples ?>> 		Dave
>
> 
allmost all selinux messages.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-22 08:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008