[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add user taint flag
On Mon, 22 May 2006 15:35:48 BST, Alan Cox said:
> On Llu, 2006-05-22 at 16:14 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > we should then patch the /dev/mem driver or something to set this :)
> > (well and possibly give it an exception for now for PCI space until the
> > X people fix their stuff to use the proper sysfs stuff)
> /dev/mem is used for all sorts of sane things including DMIdecode.
> Tainting on it isn't terribly useful. Mind you this whole user taint
> patch seems bogus as it can only be set by root owned processes so
> doesn't appear to do the job it is intended for - perhaps Ted can
> explain ?

Taint on write to /dev/mem, perhaps? I don't think DMIdecode needs to
scribble on /dev/mem, does it? (Figure if a userspace program runs OK
on a recent Fedora or RedHat kernel, it doesn't need to scribble on /dev/mem
too much, because the vast majority of it is lopped out via a patch....)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-22 16:32    [W:0.073 / U:1.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site