Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 02 May 2006 13:00:25 -0700 | | From | Martin Bligh <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 |
| |
> That's really strange - i wonder why the backtracer can't find the original > stack. Should probably add some printk diagnosis here. > > Can you send the output with this patch? > > Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c > +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c > @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ void show_trace(unsigned long *stack) > HANDLE_STACK (stack < estack_end); > i += printk(" <EOE>"); > stack = (unsigned long *) estack_end[-2]; > + printk("new stack %lx (%lx %lx %lx %lx %lx)\n", stack, estack_end[0], estack_end[-1], estack_end[-2], estack_end[-3], estack_end[-4]); > continue; > } > if (irqstack_end) {
Thanks for running this Andy:
http://test.kernel.org/abat/30183/debug/console.log - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |