lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1
    > That's really strange - i wonder why the backtracer can't find the original
    > stack. Should probably add some printk diagnosis here.
    >
    > Can you send the output with this patch?
    >
    > Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
    > ===================================================================
    > --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
    > +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
    > @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ void show_trace(unsigned long *stack)
    > HANDLE_STACK (stack < estack_end);
    > i += printk(" <EOE>");
    > stack = (unsigned long *) estack_end[-2];
    > + printk("new stack %lx (%lx %lx %lx %lx %lx)\n", stack, estack_end[0], estack_end[-1], estack_end[-2], estack_end[-3], estack_end[-4]);
    > continue;
    > }
    > if (irqstack_end) {

    Thanks for running this Andy:

    http://test.kernel.org/abat/30183/debug/console.log
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-02 22:03    [W:0.026 / U:29.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site