lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Compiling C++ modules
    Kyle Moffett wrote:
    > On May 2, 2006, at 11:19:35, Avi Kivity wrote:
    >> I wasn't talking about modifying gcc to do the checking, rather using
    >> language features so that the checks would happen during a regular
    >> compile. That would mean we weren't dependent on somebody running
    >> sparse with a configuration that triggers the bug, but those few who
    >> compile the code before submitting the patch would get it
    >> automatically checked.
    >
    > There's a reason that we tell all patch submitters to run "make C=1"
    > on several configs before submitting patches. Besides, you seem to
    > have a vast misunderstanding of LK development processes; we frown
    > heavily on people who don't "compile their code before submitting the
    > patch", it's not a rare thing at all.
    >

    That was tongue in cheek. Perhaps I should have added a smiley.

    I follow lkml quite closely, even though I lack the time to contribute
    in the areas that interest me.

    --
    Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-02 17:32    [W:0.021 / U:0.488 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site