lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Compiling C++ modules
Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On May 2, 2006, at 11:19:35, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> I wasn't talking about modifying gcc to do the checking, rather using
>> language features so that the checks would happen during a regular
>> compile. That would mean we weren't dependent on somebody running
>> sparse with a configuration that triggers the bug, but those few who
>> compile the code before submitting the patch would get it
>> automatically checked.
>
> There's a reason that we tell all patch submitters to run "make C=1"
> on several configs before submitting patches. Besides, you seem to
> have a vast misunderstanding of LK development processes; we frown
> heavily on people who don't "compile their code before submitting the
> patch", it's not a rare thing at all.
>

That was tongue in cheek. Perhaps I should have added a smiley.

I follow lkml quite closely, even though I lack the time to contribute
in the areas that interest me.

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-02 17:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site