![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:02, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >>>Oh that's a 32bit kernel. I don't think the 32bit NUMA has ever worked >>>anywhere but some Summit systems (at least every time I tried it it blew up >>>on me and nobody seems to use it regularly). Maybe it would be finally time to mark it >>>CONFIG_BROKEN though or just remove it (even by design it doesn't work very well) >> >>Bollocks. It works fine, > > On what kind of box? Some summit system, right? Summit and NUMA-Q, ie everything we originally created it for. > Well, it doesn't work for Ingo clearly. My own experiences every time > I tried it were similar. What platform? > I think I stand by my original statement. If it works fine on some platforms and not on others, I would venture to suggest it's a platform-specific issue, and marking the whole thing as CONFIG_BROKEN would be an entirely inappropriate overreaction to what is probably a simple bug. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-02 13:20 [W:0.514 / U:0.190 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||