![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:23:41AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > If the count of values handled in a transaction is not to high and it > makes sense to group these values logically, why not just create an > attribute group for every transaction, which creates dummy attributes > to fill the values in, and use an "action" file in that group, that > commits all the values at once to whatever target? That should fit into > the ioctl use pattern, right? That's what configfs can handle easier. I think the issue is getting stuff from the kernel in one atomic snapshot (all the different file values from the same point in time.) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-02 05:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||