lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> wrote:
>
> let me
> give a simple example here:

Examples are useful.

> "pid virtualization"
>
> - Linux-VServer doesn't really need that right now.
> we are perfectly fine with "pid isolation" here, we
> only "virtualize" the init pid to make pstree happy
>
> - Snapshot/Restart and Migration will require "full"
> pid virtualization (that's where Eric and OpenVZ
> are heading towards)

snapshot/restart/migration worry me. If they require complete
serialisation of complex kernel data structures then we have a problem,
because it means that any time anyone changes such a structure they need to
update (and test) the serialisation.

This may be a show-stopper, in which case maybe we only need to virtualise
pid #1.

> - OpenSSI and *Mosix require system wide pid spaces
> which probably could be implemented with virtual
> pid spaces as well
>
> - many security addons provide something called pid
> randomization, and I think they could probably
> benefit from a virtual pid space, too

ok.

Anyway. Thanks, guys. It sound like most of this work will be nicely
separable so we can think about each bit as it comes along.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-19 17:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans