[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction
    Herbert Poetzl <> wrote:
    > let me
    > give a simple example here:

    Examples are useful.

    > "pid virtualization"
    > - Linux-VServer doesn't really need that right now.
    > we are perfectly fine with "pid isolation" here, we
    > only "virtualize" the init pid to make pstree happy
    > - Snapshot/Restart and Migration will require "full"
    > pid virtualization (that's where Eric and OpenVZ
    > are heading towards)

    snapshot/restart/migration worry me. If they require complete
    serialisation of complex kernel data structures then we have a problem,
    because it means that any time anyone changes such a structure they need to
    update (and test) the serialisation.

    This may be a show-stopper, in which case maybe we only need to virtualise
    pid #1.

    > - OpenSSI and *Mosix require system wide pid spaces
    > which probably could be implemented with virtual
    > pid spaces as well
    > - many security addons provide something called pid
    > randomization, and I think they could probably
    > benefit from a virtual pid space, too


    Anyway. Thanks, guys. It sound like most of this work will be nicely
    separable so we can think about each bit as it comes along.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-19 17:17    [W:0.024 / U:4.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site