![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:57:28PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: >> On Thu, 18 May 2006 17:09:41 +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: >>> + omap_writew(0, (OMAP_MPUIO_BASE + OMAP_MPUIO_IO_CNTL)); >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Could that be done in a macro? > > Is there any benefit to doing so? > >>> + udelay(0.04); >> Floating point in the kernel? > > Not quite. udelay is a macro on ARM so this ends up as an integer before > it ever hits a function call. In an ideal world I'd use "ndelay(40);" > but that would result in a delay of over 1µs as ARM doesn't have ndelay > defined so we hit the generic fallback. Use instead: /* delay for at least 40 ns */ udelay(1); Or better yet provide an ndelay implementation for ARM. David Vrabel -- David Vrabel, Design Engineer Arcom, Clifton Road Tel: +44 (0)1223 411200 ext. 3233 Cambridge CB1 7EA, UK Web: http://www.arcom.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-05-19 11:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||