lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 18 May 2006 08:54:25 +0400
FromStas Sergeev <>
SubjectRe: [patch] add input_enable_device()
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>> Why does it have the INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_BUS after all?
>>> For userspace benefits.
>> How exactly does the userspace benefit from the
>> INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_BUS thing?
This is still not answered. If INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_BUS
is there, then I don't see the argument that the input
layer is not designed for the like things.

> You just do not want to implement proper access control for the
> hardware, that's it.
Depends on an answer to the question above, whether using
input is the proper way or not.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-18 06:56    [from the cache]
©2003-2008